The President shall provide notification of any such removal to both Houses of Congress. The Deputy Director shall be a citizen of the United States who has a professional background and experience in patent or trademark law. The Commissioner for Patents shall be a citizen of the United States with demonstrated management ability and professional background and experience in patent law and serve for a term of 5 years.
The Commissioner for Trademarks shall be a citizen of the United States with demonstrated management ability and professional background and experience in trademark law and serve for a term of 5 years.
The Commissioner for Patents and the Commissioner for Trademarks shall serve as the chief operating officers for the operations of the Office relating to patents and trademarks, respectively, and shall be responsible for the management and direction of all aspects of the activities of the Office that affect the administration of patent and trademark operations, respectively.
The Secretary may reappoint a Commissioner to subsequent terms of 5 years as long as the performance of the Commissioner as set forth in the performance agreement in subparagraph B is satisfactory. B Salary and performance agreement.
The compensation of the Commissioners shall be considered, for purposes of section c 2 A of title 18 , to be the equivalent of that described under clause ii of section c 2 A of title The annual performance agreements shall incorporate measurable organization and individual goals in key operational areas as delineated in an annual performance plan agreed to by the Commissioners and the Secretary.
C Removal. The Secretary shall provide notification of any such removal to both Houses of Congress. B define the title, authority, and duties of such officers and employees and delegate to them such of the powers vested in the Office as the Director may determine. The Office shall not be subject to any administratively or statutorily imposed limitation on positions or personnel, and no positions or personnel of the Office shall be taken into account for purposes of applying any such limitation.
The payment of a rate of basic pay under this paragraph shall not be subject to the pay limitation under section e or of title 5. C such transfer would be in the interest of the Office, as determined by the Secretary of Commerce in consultation with the Director. Any transfer under this paragraph shall be effective as of the same effective date as referred to in paragraph 1 , and shall be made without a break in service.
Need any more clarity? Pick one. Shifty, why pick one? Speaking of replies, since you have your undies in a bunch on one question , does this mean that YOU are going to supply cogent and on-point answers to the direct questions put to you? What is not normal here is the use — by you — of the rhetorical device of speaking in the plural. Here is an easy and simple chance for you to answer a direct question to you with a cogent and inte11ectually honest answer:. Remember, you control the choice of you being inane.
I am just enterprising off of your seeming inability to not be inane. Especially when it comes to posts by me: congrats, as you have now hit more than posts in a row to or about me while not engaging on ANY other topic or ANY other person. As of at least Nov. Ross, while ochestrating the trade war, sat on the board of a Chinese investment company with ties to Chinese state-owned enterprises.
Almost everyone involved in politics is corrupt or at least ethically compromised. The question is only one of degree and frequency. But, an even more obvious example of this alleged corruption being the recent Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos fraud scandal which involved LOTS of patents! Sorry about the run-on sentences!
Was writing too fast! Hope to do better the next time! Of course, many independent inventors have garbage representation that is happy to take a garbage allowance, so maybe it balances out in the end? At the very least all those file wrappers need to be looked at which we hope to be able to do.
But, the FBI should definitely look into that one! Certainly not something I would be proud of!!! What are the odds of the very same anonymized application, provided with the same list of prior art from any source and the very same claims, will get examined by two different Examiners, in the same way, using the same arguments, addressed to the same prior art and that they will arrive at the same decisions as to allowance or denial?
What do you think those odds are? Extremely narrow and easily circumvented i. But, independent inventors and new start-ups??? Eh, who cares about them?! Who wants that in a no-holds-barred capitalist country?! They can just get menial jobs like everyone else. Paul was good enough to provide the citation. If your unarticulated question is whether you screwed up: yes; you did, 20 bucks a pop.
You may ask that your errant post be deleted. Yet again, you turn your own lack of understanding into a ploy that the other person is not making sense.
A link is an incorporation by reference, Snowflake. That is why we do not allow links, Snowflake. Do you use incorporations by reference in all those imaginary persuasive briefs you write? LOL — you do know what forum you are in, eh? We had a brief interlude into our conversations from someone who described my writing as sandpaper.
He was closer to the mark, and that description clearly is incongruent with your attempted portrayal. Chance are that you simply recognize a pop culture reference AS a put-down, and want to use that reference. How about one of them links of yours to refresh our memory?
The sandpaper reference was made after the date of the last commissioned crawl of the comments, so I do not have a ready link. I am sure that somewhere along the line you heard that is was an insult.
So you figured that you would just use it. But like so many other things, actual context is not something you grasp. And thus, we have yet another instance in which your posting makes only you look bad. So you are not contesting that you are toilet paper? And you have not yet got your errant post deleted? What it DOES do though, is show your obsess10n with me and — again, feeds my enterprising off of your choices.
So, seven out of the eight current thread obsess10ns you have with me provide nothing but regurgitated one-liners from you. You are playing the false presumption game again — at no point here is the issue being one that calls into question my understanding. The Patent Act was written as follows: A Commissioner of Patents, one first assistant commissioner, two assistant commissioners, and nine examiners-in-chief, shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Hirshfeld began his career in as a Patent Examiner and became a Supervisory Patent Examiner in Skip to main content. Breadcrumb Home About Leadership. Was this page helpful? Helpful Not helpful.
0コメント