Moderators indicate when or under what conditions a particular effect can be expected. A moderator may increase the strength of a relationship, decrease the strength of a relationship, or change the direction of a relationship.
In the classic case, a relationship between two variables is significant i. For example, work stress increases drinking problems for people with a highly avoidant e. As another example see Fig. Statistically, a moderator is revealed through a significant interaction. Mediator variables specify how or why a particular effect or relationship occurs.
Mediators describe the psychological process that occurs to create the relationship, and as such are always dynamic properties of individuals e. In full mediation , a mediator fully explains the relationship between the independent and dependent variable: without the mediator in the model, there is no relationship.
In partial mediation , there is still a statistical relationship between the independent and dependent variable even when the mediator is taken out of a model: the mediator only partially explains the relationship. You use a descriptive research design for this study. After collecting data on each of these variables, you perform statistical analysis to check whether:.
A moderator influences the level, direction, or presence of a relationship between variables. It shows you for whom, when, or under what circumstances a relationship will hold. Moderators usually help you judge the external validity of your study by identifying the limitations of when the relationship between variables holds. For example, while social media use can predict levels of loneliness, this relationship may be stronger for adolescents than for older adults.
Age is a moderator here. This means that the relationship between years of experience and salary would differ between men, women, and those who do not identify as men or women. To test this statistically, you perform a multiple regression analysis for the data on work experience and salary, with gender identity added in the model. You compare the statistical significance of the model with and without gender identity included to determine whether it moderates the relationship between work experience and salary.
The Steps: 1. Estimate the relationship between Y on X controlling for M wakefulness on hours since dawn, controlling for coffee consumption -Should be non-significant and nearly 0. Here we find that our total effect model shows a significant positive relationship between hours since dawn X and wakefulness Y.
Our Path A model shows that hours since down X is also positively related to coffee consumption M. Our Path B model then shows that coffee consumption M positively predicts wakefulness Y when controlling for hours since dawn X. Finally, wakefulness Y does not predict hours since dawn X when controlling for coffee consumption M.
Since the relationship between hours since dawn and wakefulness is no longer significant when controlling for coffee consumption, this suggests that coffee consumption does in fact mediate this relationship. The Sobel Test uses a specialized t-test to determine if there is a significant reduction in the effect of X on Y when M is present.
You can either use this value to calculate your p-value or run the mediation. However, the Sobel Test is largely considered an outdated method since it assumes that the indirect effect ab is normally distributed and tends to only have adequate power with large sample sizes. Thus, again, it is highly recommended to use the mediation bootstrapping method instead.
To run the mediate function, we will again need a model of our IV hours since dawn , predicting our mediator coffee consumption like our Path A model above. We will also need a model of the direct effect of our IV hours since dawn on our DV wakefulness , when controlling for our mediator coffee consumption. When can then use mediate to repeatedly simulate a comparsion between these models and to test the signifcance of the indirect effect of coffee consumption.
The ACME here is the indirect effect of M total effect - direct effect and thus this value tells us if our mediation effect is significant. In other words, moderation tests for interactions that affect WHEN relationships between variables occur.
Like mediation, moderation assumes that there is little to no measurement error in the moderator variable and that the DV did not CAUSE the moderator. If moderator error is likely to be high, researchers should collect multiple indicators of the construct and use SEM to estimate latent variables. The safest ways to make sure your moderator is not caused by your DV are to experimentally manipulate the variable or collect the measurement of your moderator before you introduce your IV.
Moderation can be tested by looking for significant interactions between the moderating variable Z and the IV X. Notably, it is important to mean center both your moderator and your IV to reduce multicolinearity and make interpretation easier. Centering can be done using the scale function, which subtracts the mean of a variable from each value in that variable.
For more information on the use of centering, see? This occurs by X affecting M leading to M affecting Y, which is called the indirect effect. The direct effect is the relationship between X and Y in the presence of a mediator. Mediation occurs when 1 there is a statistically significant indirect effect 2 the direct effect is smaller than the total effect. Moderation analyses look at interactions. Moderator variables modify the relationship between X and Y. They affect the strength and direction of the relationship between X and Y.
An interaction or product term represents the moderator effect. Mediators are possible explanations for a relationship between X and Y. Moderators affect the magnitude of the effect of X on Y.
0コメント